Why Your Vote Won't Matter
by John Kaminski
|
So, you're going to cast your vote to prove that you live in a
democracy, are you? Guess again, Chuck.
Your vote does not matter. It might not even be counted, assuming
you're allowed to vote to begin with.
| |
In fact, if you're black, and the
first four letters of your last name match the first four letters on
that famously fabricated list of Florida felons, you definitely won't be
voting at all, because the state of Florida hasn't bothered to fix its
mistakes from the last election - the same problems that allowed George
W. Bush to slither into the White House like the rapine reptilian he is
are still in force.
Plus, the thoughtful Republicans in Florida, led by the president's
porcine brother Jeb Bush [John Ellis "Jeb" Bush
Governor of Florida], have added some new obstacles to counting the
votes accurately, the best of which is the new touchscreen voting
system, which eliminates the paper trail that would expose ballot
manipulation and also would be used for legitimate recounts in the case
of very close elections. No more recounts - isn't that efficient?
Angry columnist Jackson Thoreau recently penned a comprehensive
roundup of Republican shenanigans going on around the country to reduce
the Democratic vote. Read the whole story at americaheldhostile -
or let me give you this brief synopsis:
You have to hand it to the Republicans for evil inventiveness. In
New Mexico, the GOP tried to bribe the Green Party to run candidates in
three Congressional races to siphon votes away from popular Democrats.
Of course, the principled Greens refused. In Michigan, Republicans
recruited nine "stealth" candidates to run as Democrats, thereby
discouraging legitimate opposition. In early voting in Dallas, Texas,
voting machines were recording Democratic votes as Republican; the GOP,
when caught, blamed it on "miscalibration." In Arkansas, many African
American voters were asked to produce their voter ID cards in a blatant
effort at intimidation. Officials in South Dakota want new restrictions
on Native American voters.
Did you know that Republicans used private planes from Enron Corp.
and Halliburton Co., the firm headed by Dick Cheney that also practiced
phony accounting fraud, to crisscross the state and block the counting
of Florida votes? This time around in the Florida primary, misleading
fliers were circulated again, saying that some people should vote on a
day after Nov. 5. Similar fliers were circulated in Florida before the
2000 election, which some say confused some voters there. I bet they'd
like to hire Arthur Andersen to audit Florida's elections system.
But these are trivial gestures - distracting parlor games, really -
and not the real issue that proves your own vote will not matter.
President Bush supposedly signed new Election Reform Legislation
into law earlier this month. Kay J. Maxwell, president of the League of
Women Voters of the United States, stated: "Because of the hard work of
many ? elected officials, advocacy groups, and grassroots organizations
such as ours, America’s voters can look forward to real changes at their
polling places over the next few years." Right, the next few years. But
not this year. Nothing, especially in Florida, has really changed at
all.
Where we begin to get a little closer to the truth is not in the
debate about who can vote, although that certainly is important, but in
the mechanics of the voting. Call it the hanging chad tangent, if you
like.
Like the voting machines. Who provides them, and who operates them?
Most recently, a former Florida secretary of state profited by being
a lobbyist for both the state's counties and the company that sold some
of them touch-screen voting machines used in last month's botched
primary election. Sandra Mortham, who served as the state's top
elections official from 1995 to 1999, is a lobbyist for both Election
Systems & Software and the Florida Association of Counties, which
exclusively endorsed the company's touchscreen machines in return for a
commission... Mortham received a commission from ES&S for every county
that bought its touch-screen machines. The exact terms have not been
disclosed... Mortham is of course a Republican who before a scandal
brought her down was going to be Jeb Bush's running mate in Florida.
And of course, there is the current problem in Nebraska. Look at the
documents, see the loop: ES&S, according to the Nebraska Elections
Division, is the ONLY vote-counting company certified to sell machines
in Nebraska. ES&S counts 80 percent of the votes; the remaining 20
percent are hand counts.
ES&S is owned by the McCarthy Group; Michael McCarthy runs the
McCarthy Group; Michael McCarthy is the Campaign Treasurer for
Republican Senator Chuck Hagel; The FEC designates Michael McCarthy as a
Primary Campaign Committee for Candidate Chuck Hagel; and Chuck Hagel's
financials list the McCarthy Group as an Asset, with his investment
valued at $1-$5 million.
Hagel came to Omaha from Washington, where he worked with the first
George Bush Administration. In news articles by the Omaha World-Herald,
Hagel said he was coming to Omaha to become president and partner in the
McCarthy Group and Chairman of American Information Systems.
In his congressional bio he is said to have come to Omaha "to
prepare for running for office." The first thing he did was run American
Information Systems, a vote-counting company. Hagel was the first
Republican in 24 years to win a Nebraska senatorial campaign. He
continues to disclose an investment of $1-5 million in the McCarthy
Group, but he does not identify the underlying assets (ES&S). His
disclosure documents omit any mention of American Information Systems at
all. John Gottschalk has been reported as a director for both the
World-Herald Company Inc. (concentrating on the non-newspaper
subsidiaries) and ES&S. He was also involved with Senator Hagel in the
World USO, has relationships with James Baker; he is listed as a USO pal
of George W. Bush. Hmm, there's that certain odor again. [The unabridged information on this can be accessed at
talion.com]
This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to voting
machines, by the way, as you could read in the aforementioned reference.
Perhaps the greatest vote-fixing story of the computer age occurred in
the 1988 Republican primary in New Hampshire, where it is likely that a
notoriously riggable collection of "Shouptronic" computers "preordained"
voting results to give George Bush his "Hail Mary" victory in New
Hampshire. Nobody save a small group of computer engineers, like John
Sununu, the state's Republican governor, would be the wiser.
"People who mistrust the voting process cannot, in the traditional
American way, accept the defeat of their candidates gracefully and work
loyally with the winners. Instead, more and more American voters are
feeling "had," "scammed," "hoodwinked" by the voting system. Trust has
almost departed. There is the nagging, unproven, yet pervasive feeling
that the "experts," the "spin doctors," the "covert operators" and the
"private interests" have put their technicians and consultants in
absolute control of the national vote count, and that in any selected
situation these computer wizards can and will program the vote as their
masters wish." So wrote James M. Collier in his 1992 classic, "Votescam:
The Stealing of America." [Votescam]
This New Hampshire primary was perhaps the most polled primary
election in American history, and in the end, the Republican voters in
the state confounded the predictions of nearly every published survey of
voter opinion, Collier wrote. Gallup's glaring error and the miscalls of
other polling organizations once again raised questions about the
accuracy of polls. What nobody seriously wrote about was that the polls
were usually right and that the computers were eminently "fixable." Read
the whole sorry tale at Votescam - chapter1. When you do
you'll realize that not just the second Bush was an illegitimately
elected president.
What really determines elections is who counts the votes, and who
counts the votes is somebody you probably didn't know, and if you did
know them, you surely wouldn't trust them to count the votes. No
government agency counts the votes. And the people who count the votes,
who tell you who your next president is, have no government oversight,
no audit, no official you have elected watching over them.
The people who really count the votes are the media, more
specifically a politically influenced cabal of minions bought and paid
for by corporate tycoons who own the nation's major media outlets. These
are the same people who don't think peace demonstrations are worthy of
coverage, and who in the year 2000 got together and reviewed the data
from Florida and then really wouldn't tell us what they found out.
They'd only say ... Bush won, just like the Supreme Court. The highest
court of the United States wouldn't let Florida recount its ballots, and
the highest media of the United States wouldn't tell us what they found
when they did. In case you were wondering, there is no honest official
vote total from the last election, only the one "certified" by Katherine
Harris.
Evan Ravitz, founder of the website vote.org, has itemized the major
problems with America's manipulable election system [Vote.org/fraud].
"When I directed Boulder, Colorado's Voting by Phone ballot
initiative campaign in 1993 I learned many unnerving things about
existing voting procedures. The problems revealed in Florida are just
the beginning," Ravitz wrote. Here's his list:
- The Voter News Service (formerly News Election Service) - which
supplies ALL election-eve numbers on national and Congressional races -
is a private business of the TV networks, The New York Times, the
Washington Post and the Associated Press. If you ask them how they count
votes and predict outcomes they say that's proprietary information! They
have no web site or other public profile. And they won't tell you a
thing about how they do what they do
- Most votes in America are counted by computer programs which are
also proprietary secrets. Not even election officials are allowed to
inspect these programs (the "source code") to verify their accuracy.
Election officials can test the programs (using "test decks") but any
clever programmer can write a program which passes tests but falsifies
the election.
- In most jurisdictions, identification for voting is on the honor
system. Signatures, if taken, are not compared to your signature on file
in most places unless you are "challenged" by election judges or poll
watchers, a rare event. When this system started hundreds of years ago,
the election judges or poll watchers knew most everyone in their
precincts. In modern America, this is rarely true.
- Mail or absentee ballots are often delivered to old addresses,
and the USPS is not supposed to forward them. Whoever gets one could
fill it out in the rightful voter's name. This is discussed in the
document "Florida Voter Fraud Issues" from the Florida Department Of Law
Enforcement. In student and other high-turnover areas, this problem is
rife.
- In states with "early" voting, there is no system to prevent
people from voting early at an elections office and then also voting at
their precinct. This is going on right now as we speak. (See the Dallas
anecdote above.)
So, here's the deal: the people who count the votes are the same
people who both predict (via the use of polls) the winners and also
report on the outcomes of these elections. Do you think they have any
interest in promoting their credibility by seeing their predictions
verified? After all, these are private businesses.
Also, the actual members of the Voter News Service are super-rich
media barons, with intimate ties to the power structure of America,
which chooses all of the major candidates for president in every
election. Do you think they might be in agreement who will win before
the election ever transpires?
As Collier wrote of the 1988 fiasco in New Hampshire, "there was no
rechecking of the computerized voting machines, no inquiry into the path
of the vote from the voting machines to the central tallying place, no
public scrutiny of the mechanisms of the mighty peculiar vote that saved
George Bush's career and leapfrogged the relatively obscure Sununu into
the White House."
The media giants who reported on - and recounted - Florida's votes
in the 2000 election failed to report one simple fact: that by law,
ballots rejected by counting machines have to be hand-counted. This did
not occur, and this was not widely reported.
If either had occurred, you know who would not be in the White House
at this moment trying to make war on the entire world. If either had
occurred, our Constitutional Bill of Rights would still be in force,
which now, as a result of this convenient media oversight, it is not.
The same wealthy patricians who undercount the number of people who
attend antiwar demonstrations, who pretend there are no political
opinions in the United States except Republican and Democratic, who
deride "liberals" and blithely report that Paul Wellstone's political
assassination was just a mysterious accident - and that 9/11 was an
attack by disenchanted Muslim terrorists ... these are the same people
who are predicting and reporting on your elections, as well as the very
ones who actually count the votes and give you the totals.
Which is why your vote in Tuesday's election will most definitely
not really matter.
- – John Kaminski
John Kaminski is a writer living on the coast of Florida who will
not be voting for Katherine Harris [who should be indicted for 22,000 counts of civil rights violations] in Tuesday's election.
More voting problems - links:
Election problems in Arkansas - Republicans go to court to keep some
votes uncounted -
KARK
Problems in Texas - next year they will use touchscreen machines -
news8austin
Provisional ballots cause problems in Kansas -
the Kansas City Channel
Equipment causes voting problems in several counties (South Carolina) -
The State
Equipment causes voting problems in several counties -
(Florida) Herald Tribune
Election night problems continue in Adams County (Nebraska) -
Independent
Atlantic County tally delayed by computer problems (NJ) -
newsday
Ballot shortage and polling problems (Michigan) -
TV7-4
Ballot shortages in San Francisco -
KRON4
and surely you've seen this:
Miami
|
|
